US v. Battle:
Battle pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Prior to
that conviction he had sustained a conviction in Maryland for assault with intent
to murder, along with two convictions for distributing drugs. As a result, when
he was sentenced in 2011 he was sentenced to 180 months in prison under the
Armed Career Criminal Act. After Johnson, he received permission to file
a second or successive 2255 motion and argued that the assault conviction was
no longer a violent felony for ACCA purposes. The district court denied the
motion.
On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the
denial of Battle’s 2255 motion, concluding that assault with intent to murder
is a violent felony. Noting that the offense required a “specific intent to
bring about the death of the assault victim,” the court held that such an assault
requires the level of violent force necessary to be a violent felony. It
rejected Battle’s argument that a conviction could be had via indirect force
(such as via poisoning), relying once again on the Supreme Court’s Castleman decision. The court also noted
that Battle could not point to any Maryland state cases where such an assault
was committed by omission.
No comments:
Post a Comment