US v. Woodson:
In 2009, Woodson was convicted of a single count of distribution of an
uncharged amount of crack cocaine and sentenced to 151 months as a career
offender. After the passage of the First Step Act, Woodson moved for relief
under the provisions that made the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 retroactive. The
district court denied him relief, holding that because he was convicted under
21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)(C) and the Fair Sentencing Act did not change the statutory
sentencing range for his offense he had not been convicted of a “covered
offense” and was not eligible for relief.
The Fourth Circuit reversed the district
court’s decision. The court held that a conviction under 841(b)(1)(C) was a
covered offense because the Fair Sentencing Act had the effect of modifying all
the sentencing provisions related to crack cocaine in that it changed the
thresholds necessary for each increased statutory sentencing range. Thus, even
if Woodson’s own statutory range did not change, the statute as a whole had
been modified by the Fair Sentencing Act and he was eligible for a reduced
sentence (which he got when the court entered an order back in
April remanding this case to the district court).
Congrats to the Defender office in NDWV on the win!
No comments:
Post a Comment