US v. Hawley:
Hawley pleaded guilty to two counts each of being a felon in possession of a
firearm and distributing heroin. At sentencing, he was attributed one criminal
history point for a prior state misdemeanor conviction where he had validly
waived his right to counsel and been sentenced to six months in jail. Counting
that sentence put Hawley in Criminal History Category V, rather than IV. He
objected that, under Guideline commentary that “prior sentences, not otherwise
excluded, are to be counted in the criminal history score, including
uncounseled misdemeanor sentences where imprisonment was not imposed,” by its
structure, meant that uncounseled sentences were imprisonment was imposed
should not count. The district court rejected that argument and sentenced
Hawley to 57 months in prison, the bottom of the advisory Guideline range.
On appeal the Fourth Circuit affirmed
Hawley’s sentence. The court started by noting that under the language of USSG
4A1.2(c)(1) itself the misdemeanor conviction counted in the criminal history
score. It rejected the argument that under “the interpretative canon expression unius est exclusio alterius
the “negative implication of Guideline 4A1.2’s background commentary barred the
district court from counting prior uncounseled misdemeanor conviction for which
imprisonment was imposed – even when, as here, a defendant validly waives his
right to counsel.” By contrast, the “background commentary, by its plain
language, contemplates that it is providing a non-exhaustive list, an inference
of negative implication is inappropriate.” A contrary conclusion, reached by
the Second Circuit, was not compelling because that case involved “constitutional
problems” related to the waiver of counsel which weren’t present in Hawley’s
case.
No comments:
Post a Comment